We've Had Enough
 
"Never did I imagine  that this fundamental, logical, and progressive ruling
could be challenged- or  worse- overturned in our modern society."
By Sarah Robinson

It has been 40 years since the Supreme Court decision in favor  of women’s health in the monumental Roe
v. Wade
case from 1973. I feel fortunate that my entire life, this decision  has protected my right to legal and safe abortion, should I ever need to  consider that option. My attitude is forever grateful for the women and men activists who fought to ensure this right to American women. Never did I imagine  that this fundamental, logical, and progressive ruling could be challenged- or  worse- overturned in our modern society. If anyone told me those activists  endured the fight in vain, I would react with disbelief. That is, until about  two years ago. 

Currently, in the national and statewide political arena, some politicians have irrationally taken an opposing position against women and their bodies, in direct contrast to the requests of their constituents. Not to mention, in blatant substitution or disregard for dire, undecided issues like the housing market or unemployment. How did our country get here? How long can we allow the government to take us back in time? 
 
I suppose we as citizens are partially to blame. We have let politicians use us as pawns; where wombs become the battleground. Cunningly, market generated labels like pro-choice and pro-life have boxed-in and polarized
otherwise open minded voters. Laws cloaked with the false intent for “patient safety” or movements to define “personhood” have made us lose sight of the basics of the decision in Roe. It is a question of privacy and dignity.

 It is undeniable:  the decision to have an abortion is not black and white. And yet, in the current political climate we are asked to make it so. It is entirely unreasonable to render one country, or even one state, capable of conforming to a single set of acceptable and unacceptable choices. That’s why I really like the new campaign from Planned Parenthood called “Not in Her Shoes.” The video helps explain how complex any given situation regarding abortion or parenthood can be. The campaign invites advocates and voters to develop a fresh perspective by shedding the old pro-this and anti-that labels. 

The bottom line is this: abortion is never a goal. It is a deep, complex decision that most Americans agree a woman must determine for herself with the support of her family and physician. Organizations like Planned Parenthood, who do provide abortion services, also offer countless family planning, contraceptive, and educational services as well. Arguably, Planned Parenthood does more than any other organization to prevent unintended pregnancies, thus drastically decreasing the need for abortions. The ruling from Roe v. Wade simply determines that abortion remains a safe and legal option should a situation arise within the first 3 months of pregnancy. Without access and rights, consider the options:
have an unwanted child and all it entails, or endure an illegal operation, risking fertility and life. Let’s get real. It is evident women will have abortions whether they are legal or not. Legality keeps abortion safe. When something is legal we as a society and legislature are able to regulate it. 
 
Personally, having access to safe and legal abortions gives me the power to construct and determine my life as I see fit. It reinforces my dignity as a woman and leaves me responsible and trusted with important life decisions. Think of it this way: in the not so distant past, a woman could potentially have almost 10 pregnancies to full term before the age of thirty.
Reproductive justice has freed women from the constructs and roles of traditional femininity. I can be a mother, or not; an astronaut or perhaps even a lawmaker. Needless to say, I couldn’t imagine how dramatically different my
life would be without that cornerstone decision 40 years ago. 

Thanks to Roe v. Wade, abortion remains a legal, medical procedure. It is a personal and complex decision that should be left up to a woman and her doctor! Individual women have endured unbelievable ridicule and criticism from complete strangers for too long. Now, the threats have got to end.

We have had enough!  

Thank you to Sarah for participating in our 40th Anniversary Roe  v. Wade Blog Carnival.
 
 
Picture
By Katherine 

The Clara Bell Duvall Reproductive Freedom Project at the ACLU of Pennsylvania has re-launched the timeless and timely documentary, Motherless: a legacy of loss from illegal abortion.  This half-hour documentary by award-winning filmmakers Barbara Attie, Janet Goldwater, and Diane Pontius, is the powerful story of four individuals who lost their mothers to unsafe and illegal abortion before Roe v. Wade.

Exactly 20 years after the film's creation, the re-launch seeks to remind us of the relevance of the issues raised in Motherless in today's political climate. The culmination of our re-launch efforts are happening now (October 22nd through 28th) where  supporters are hosting house parties to screen the film and use the curricula we designed on our website to facilitate meaningful discussion and dialogue following the film. If you are still interested, house parties of any size and with any group of people are welcome! Along with house parties, we are hosting a blog carnival, a twitter festival and encouraging supporters to bring issues surrounding Motherless to the forefront of the political conversation. At the end of the re-launch, October 29th, we will be hosting a celebratory Watch Motherless party at the Philadelphia Art Alliance.

On the 29th, we invite you to join filmmakers Barbara Attie and Janet Goldwater and other activists to watch and discuss the film, and hear about how these filmmakers leverage their art to support reproductive justice. Attie and Goldwater are 2011 recipients of a Leeway Transformation Award and 2005 Pew Fellows in the Arts. 

This free event is held in conjunction with the Clara Bell Duvall Reproductive Freedom Project of the ACLU of Pennsylvania, the Leeway Foundation and the Philadelphia Art Alliance, and made possible by David and Linda Glickstein's belief in the power of art to shape a just future

The October 29th event will run from 5pm to 7:15pm at the Philadelphia Art Alliance.    Here is the program for the evening:
  • 5pm-6pm Galleries open to those who RSVP
  • 6pm-7pm Motherless screening and discussion
  • 7pm-7:15pm Wine and cheese

You can register here. We hope to see you there  for this powerful screening.  You can also follow the entire re-launch on twitter and use #watchmotherless to make sure your friends and family know about this important documentary.

 
 
By Katherine Bisanz

Women who experienced first hand the injustices that made up the daily lives of American women before the Roe v. Wade decision, which legalized abortion in the U.S., surround us daily. These women are our mothers, our grandmothers, our neighbors, and our teachers, many of them unassuming and too humble to realize the essential role that they played in the freedoms that we enjoy today. 

My mother is one of these women. Her current life as a suburb-dweller and family therapist combined with her excessive modesty hardly scream abortion activist. But her role in the movement has offered me a much greater connection to the issue of safe abortion.

My mother worked at a free clinic as an abortion counselor in the late 1960s and early 1970s when abortion was illegal. What she most remembers about the experience is how afraid women were and how powerless they felt over their bodies.

“Women were performing abortions on themselves on a daily basis,” she recalls. Many were seriously injured or died because they had no choice but to take matters, literally, into their own hands. She spoke of the difficulty of getting a woman to a legal, out-of-state abortion clinic before 1973. She remembers the anxiety in the air, as the clinic staff called names off of a list of women who would be sent to New York by bus, where abortion was legalized in 1970. This process was complicated and dangerous for the women and the volunteers involved, but they did what they had to do without flinching, because they firmly believed in our right to choose.

Despite my mother’s knowledge and care in the realm of reproductive health, she was totally unprepared for a pregnancy that occurred when the Dalkon Shield,* a form of intrauterine device (IUD), failed her in 1974 one year after Roe was passed.  She has no doubt that the excellent care that she received from the staff at Planned Parenthood while undergoing the procedure may not have been possible just one year earlier.

Today, 39 years after the Roe v. Wade decision, several new and proposed laws in Pennsylvania threaten to send us back to the days of unsafe and unavailable abortion care. Let’s not sit back and let legislators take away the rights that my mother fought so hard for. We owe it to our daughters and granddaughters to fight back. 

*The Dalkon Shield was found to cause severe injury to a disproportionately large percentage of its users which and led to numerous lawsuits and juries awarded millions of dollars in compensatory and punitive damages to thousands of women.                                   

Katherine Bisanz is pursuing a master’s degree in Social Policy & Practice at the University of Pennsylvania and interning at the ACLU-PA’s Clara Bell Duvall Reproductive Freedom Project.

Thank you to Katherine & the ACLU for participating in our Roe v. Wage Blog Carnival.  Check out more information about them at: http://aclupa.blogspot.com/2012/01/from-generation-to-generation-roe-v.html